Usa, militarizzazione, Golfo, Asia Centrale
Antiwar.com Original – 091122
● Gli Usa hanno complessivamente circa 300 basi militari in Irak ed Afghanistan, altre 800 nel mondo,
o migliaia sul proprio territorio; alcune grandi quanto una cittadina americana.
– Nessuna grande potenza nella storia ha mai avuto tanti avamposti militari in luoghi tanto lontani, né gli Han della Cina, né i romani o l’impero britannico.
– L’argomento è raramente oggetto di dibattito negli USA, il cambiamento di politica del Pentagono sulle basi militari è per gli addetti, i media non ne parlano.
– Ad es.: per il MO si parla degli insediamenti israeliani a Gerusalemme Est o nella West Bank, del nucleare iraniano, poco invece del rafforzamento delle infrastrutture militari nella regione, con tutte le possibili implicazioni per i futuri conflitti nel cuore petrolifero del pianeta.
o Ad es. i maggiori media americani non hanno riportato la creazione a Bahrain di una forza di attacco permanente della marina USA, l’Expeditionary Strike Group 5; ne ha parlato un giornale in lingua inglese degli Emirati, il National.
o Un editore del sito TomDispatch, Nick Turse, ha di recente riferito sugli investimenti del Pentagono per basi in Afghanistan.
● Sul Golfo: Uscire dall’Irak non significa andarsene dalla regione:
o mentre Washington parla del ritiro dall’Irak (ridurre a 50mila il numero dei soldati ancora attorno ai 100mila entro agosto 2010, e ritirarne la maggior parte per il dicembre 2011), il Pentagono costruisce basi militari ovunque nella regione, tranne in Iran,
o e questo significa legami più stretti tra i regimi autocratici regionali e gli USA,
o ed un crescente armamento e militarizzazione di un’area storicamente instabile.
– È probabile inoltre che un importante contingente militare americano rimanga in diverse basi secondarie in Irak anche ben dopo il 2011;
o altre forse saranno stanziate vicine, in basi nella regio dove si è continuato a rafforzare, sviluppare e rinnovare strutture USA e degli alleati, con i media che se ne occupano scarsamente.
– Il capo del Comando centrale USA, Centcom, Petraeus: «I paesi della penisola arabica sono partner chiave … le forze speciali Centcom di terra, aria e mare partecipano a numerose operazioni ed addestramenti, bilaterali, multilaterali con essi …
– Le nostre vendite militari estere (FMS) e programmi di finanziamento militare estero (FMF) aiutano a migliorare le capacità e interoperabilità delle forze dei nostri alleati. Stiamo anche lavorando per una rete di difesa integrata aerea e missilistica per il Golfo.
– Tutti questi sforzi di cooperai zone sono facilitati dalle basi e dai porti che Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, gli EAU [Emirati Arabi Uniti] ed altri forniscono alle forze USA».
● Gli investimenti a lungo termine del Pentagono nelle strutture suddette, dal 2001, sono fatti concreti che dimostrano come continuerà la presenza militare USA nella regione, a prescindere da ciò che succede in Irak.
● Il conflitto in corso con Al-Qaeda deriva in buona parte dalla presenza militare USA nella regione.
– 1996, pur non avendo una sua aeronautica militare, il Qatar ha costruito la base aeronautica di al-Udeid, costo oltre $1MD, obiettivo attrarre i militari USA.
– Settembre 2001, l’aeronautica americana ha iniziato ad utilizzarla, nel 2002 pieno utilizzo con i vari equipaggiamenti militari e di telecomunicazione, e migliaia di soldati. Nel 2005 il governo del Qatar ha speso quasi $400mn per un centro operativo aereo regionale.
– Oggi il Qatar è indispensabile ai militari USA, che negli ultimi dieci anni hanno investito molto denaro per rinnovare le strutture:
o 2001-2009, $209mn. di contratti di costruzione; agosto 2009, il gigante dell’edilizia italiano, Rizzani de Eccher, ha siglato un contratto da $44 mn con il Pentagono.
o Altri contratti con , IAP Worldwide Services, American International Contractors, Cosmopolitan-EMTA JV.
– Bahrain, 750 000 abitanti, gli USA vi hanno 3000 uomini. 2001-2009, la Marina USA ha siglato contratti di costruzioni per $203mn., uno dei maggiori appaltatori è stato Contrack International ($50mn. + $27 mn.).
– Oman: negli anni 1930 la British Royal Air Force vi utilizzava un aeroporto per le sue iniziative in MO, come oggi fanno gli USA. Nel 2001-2009 esercito ed aeronautica USA hanno ognuno spedo $13 mn. in infrastrutture, appaltatori: Cosmopolitan-EMTA JV.
– Negli EAU, 2001-2009, l’esercito USA ha speso $46mn..
– Kuwait, la Base di Camp Arifjan ospita circa 15000 soldati USA; altra base a Camp Buehring, a nord di Kuwait city. Entrambe le basi con strutture di ricreazione lussuose. 2001-2001, per infrastrutture l’esercito ha speso $502 mn., l’aeronautica $55 mn. la marina $7 mn. Nello stesso periodo, il Pentagono ha speso quasi $20 MD per petrolio, e supporto logistico per le sue strutture.
– 1950-2006, l’Arabia Saudita ha acquistato dagli USA armamenti e servizi collegati tramite l’FMS per oltre $62 MD, e tramite i FMCS (Servizi per costruzioni militari estere) $17,1MD.
– Nel 1946-2007 i sauditi hanno ricevuto finanziamenti dai militari americani per $295 mn.
– 1990-2003 (prima guerra del Golfo-invasione Irak), migliaia di militari americani di stanza in Arabia Saudita (sede di alcune dei più sacri santuari dell’Islam), uno dei più importanti fattori del conflitto con al-Qaeda.
– Oggi sono diminuiti i soldati USA in Arabia Saudita, mentre sono rimasti i contratti del Pentagono, di cui una buona parte sono progetti di strutture per le forze militari saudite, che gli Usa addestrano e cui forniscono consulenza.
– 2003-2009, $559 mn. per progetti di costruzione sauditi (a Saudi Oger Limited $160 mn.; $127 mn. a Saudi Lebanese Modern Construction Co.; $82 mn. alla saudita al-Latifia Trading and Contracting Company).
– È continuato il flusso di armi tramite il Pentagono, come pure i contratti per i servizi di supporto per gli armamenti (quest’anno a Cubic Corporation, $9,5 mn. per continuare la gestione e la manutenzione del sistema di addestramento per i piloti dell’F-15).
– Giordania, nonostante le preoccupazioni per l’intervento USA nella regione e il loro appoggio ad Israele, i militari americani hanno stretto maggiormente i legami con il paese. Le forze armate giordane hanno scelto il centro di addestramento di Cubic, sponsorizzato dalle forze americane, con un contratto per $18 mn.
Il Pentagono ha investito in infrastrutture militari in Giordania; 2001-2009 $86 mn, uno dei maggiori contraenti Archirodon, che nel 2006-2008 ha costruito una struttura di addestramento anti-terrorismo per il governo giordano, in parte sotto un contratto di $70mn dell’esercito USA; nel 2009 Archirodon ha avuto altri due contratti ($729mila e 400mila) dall’aeronautica.
Antiwar.com Original – 091122
http://original.antiwar.com –
Out of Iraq, Into the Gulf
Posted By Tom Engelhardt On November 22, 2009
– So here’s the mystery. You have a country that only recently had upward of 300 military bases, monster to micro, in a single war-torn land, Iraq. It probably now has something like 300 bases combined in Iraq and Afghanistan (where base-building is on the rise). Outside of those war zones, it has perhaps 800 more “facilities” (as they’re called) around the globe and thousands more at home. Some of them are absolutely enormous, the equivalent of small American towns with all the amenities of home.
– Without a doubt, this represents an accomplishment of some sort. Historically speaking, it’s news of the first order. No other great power, from the Han Chinese and the Romans to the British Empire, has ever built so many military outposts in such far-flung places.
– So is this empire of bases a matter of pride at home? Hardly. It’s rarely thought about. It’s not a matter for general discussion or mainstream debate, nor is it news, except on the rarest of occasions (usually when the government threatens to shut down domestic bases and job losses loom).
– Changes in Pentagon global basing policy are for Washington policy wonks, not ordinary Americans, and certainly not American reporters. From the mainstream media, you get at best a kind of shrug on the subject. Yes, from time to time, you can find a decent piece on an American military base abroad, but normally they are places where American TV reporters can safely set up their cameras and discuss other matters entirely. News about U.S. military bases being built or upgraded in distant lands is usually left to Web sites like TomDispatch to keep track of.
– When it comes to the Middle East, the building of Israeli settlements in East Jerusalem or the West Bank, or of secret nuclear facilities in Iran are major news subjects, but the building up of U.S. base infrastructure in the region? Not so much. If, for the first time in its history, the U.S. Navy sets up a permanent strike force based in Bahrain in the Persian Gulf, Expeditionary Strike Group 5, remember to check the National, the English-language paper in the United Arab Emirates, for it, not your local rag or the Washington Post, New York Times, or Wall Street Journal. Mind you, we’re talking about the U.S. Navy in the Persian Gulf, the unsettled oil and natural gas heartland of the planet, yet not a peep.
– A basic principle taught to any young reporter is: “follow the money.” A similar principle should apply to U.S. foreign policy reporting: follow the bases. As striking facts-on-the-ground, such bases tell us much about bedrock U.S. policy, whatever the policy debates in Washington. If the mainstream media ignores such bases, TomDispatch has long made it a policy of keeping an eye on them. Recently, Nick Turse, this site’s associate editor and the award-winning author of The Complex: How the Military Invades Our Everyday Lives, reported on a story only modestly and partially covered here: the way the Pentagon has been pouring money into building up its base infrastructure in Afghanistan.
– Now, he turns to the Persian Gulf region where the news is focused on a future U.S. withdrawal from Iraq. It turns out, however, that we’re withdrawing into something – that, in fact, there’s been a massive, if hardly noticed, Pentagon buildup in this region, too. You’d think it might be news. Now, at TomDispatch, thanks to Turse, it is. Tom
As Washington talks Iraq withdrawal, the Pentagon builds up bases in the region
– Despite recent large-scale insurgent suicide bombings that have killed scores of civilians and the fact that well over 100,000 U.S. troops are still deployed in that country, coverage of the U.S. war in Iraq has been largely replaced in the mainstream press by the (previously) “forgotten war” in Afghanistan. A major reason for this is the plan, developed at the end of the Bush years and confirmed by President Obama, to draw down U.S. troops in Iraq to 50,000 by August 2010 and withdraw most of the remaining forces by December 2011.
– Getting out of Iraq, however, doesn’t mean getting out of the Middle East. For one thing, it’s likely that a sizable contingent of U.S. forces will remain garrisoned on several large and remotely situated U.S. bases in Iraq well past December 2011.
– Still others will be stationed close by – on bases throughout the region where, with little media attention since the run-up to the invasion of Iraq in 2003, construction to harden, expand, and upgrade U.S. and allied facilities has gone on to this day.
– Appearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee early this year, Gen. David Petraeus, head of the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), stated: “The Arabian Peninsula commands significant U.S. attention and focus because of its importance to our interests and the potential for insecurity.” He continued:
– “[T]he countries of the Arabian Peninsula are key partners … CENTCOM ground, air, maritime, and special operations forces participate in numerous operations and training events, bilateral and multilateral, with our partners from the Peninsula. We help develop indigenous capabilities for counter terrorism; border, maritime, and critical infrastructure security; and deterring Iranian aggression.
– As a part of all this, our FMS [foreign military sales] and FMF [foreign military financing] programs are helping to improve the capabilities and interoperability of our partners’ forces. We are also working toward an integrated air and missile defense network for the Gulf. All of these cooperative efforts are facilitated by the critical base and port facilities that Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, the UAE [United Arab Emirates], and others provide for U.S. forces.”
– In fact, since 2001 the Pentagon has been pouring significant sums of money into the “critical base and port facilities” mentioned by the general – both U.S. sites and those of its key regional partners. These are often ignored facts on the ground, which signal just how enduring the U.S. military presence in the region is likely to be, no matter what happens in Iraq. Press coverage of this long-term infrastructural buildup has been remarkably minimal, given the implications for future conflicts in the oil heartlands of the planet. After all, Washington is sending tremendous amounts of military materiel into autocratic Middle Eastern nations and building-up bases in countries whose governments, due to domestic public opinion, often prefer that no publicity be given to the growing American military “footprint.”
– Given that the current conflict with al-Qaeda stemmed, in no small part, from the U.S. military presence in the region, the issue is obviously of importance. Nonetheless, coverage has been so poor that much about U.S. military efforts there remains unknown. A review of U.S. government documents, financial data, and other open-source material by TomDispatch, however, reveals that an American military building boom yet to be seriously scrutinized, analyzed, or assessed is underway in the Middle East.
– Consider, then, what we can at present know now about this Pentagon buildup, country by country from Qatar to Jordan, and while you’re reading, think about what we don’t know – and why Washington has chosen this path.
– In 1996, although it had no air force of its own, the Persian Gulf nation of Qatar built al- Udeid Air Base at a cost of more than $1 billion. The goal: attracting the U.S. military. In September 2001, U.S. aircraft began to operate out of the facility. By 2002, tanks, armored vehicles, dozens of warehouses, communications and computing equipment, and thousands of troops were based at and around al-Udeid. In 2005, the Qatari government spent almost $400 million to build a cutting-edge regional air operations center.
– Today, Qatar is all but indispensable to the U.S. military. Just recently, for example, Central Command redeployed 750 personnel from its Tampa, Fla., headquarters to its new forward headquarters at al-Udeid to test its “staff’s ability to seamlessly transition command and control of operations in the event of a crisis in the CENTCOM area of responsibility or a natural disaster in Florida.”
– Qatar has not, however, picked up the whole tab for the expanding U.S. military infrastructure in the country. The Pentagon has also been investing large amounts of money in upgrading facilities there for the last decade. From 2001-2009, the U.S. Army, for example, awarded $209 million in contracts for construction in the energy-rich emirate. In August, Rizzani de Eccher, an Italian engineering and construction giant, signed a $44 million deal with the Pentagon to replace an unspecified facility at al-Udeid. In September, the Department of Defense (DoD) awarded Florida-based IAP Worldwide Services a $6 million contract for “construction of a pre-engineered warehouse building … warehouse bay and related site work and utilities” at the base.
– Later in the month, American International Contractors, a global construction firm that specializes in “U.S.-funded Middle East and African infrastructure projects,” inked a deal for nearly $10 million to build a Special Operations Forces Training Range, complete with “a two-story shooting house, an indoor range, breach and storage facilities[,] a test-fire bunker, and bunker road” in Qatar. Just days after that, the Pentagon awarded a $52 million contract to Cosmopolitan-EMTA JV to upgrade the capacity of al-Udeid’s airfield by building additional aircraft parking ramps and fuel storage facilities.
– In nearby Bahrain – a tiny kingdom of 750,000 people – the U.S. stations up to 3,000 personnel, in addition to regular visits by the crews of Navy ships that spend time there. Between 2001-2009, the Navy awarded $203 million in construction contracts for military projects in the country. One big winner over that span has been the engineering and construction firm Contrack International. It received more than $50 million in U.S. government funds for such projects as building two “multi-story facilities for the U.S. Navy” complete with state-of-the-art communication interfaces and exterior landscaping.
– In September 2009, the company was awarded a new $27 million deal “for the design/bid/build construction of the waterfront development program, US Naval Support Activity, Bahrain.” This facility will join the Navy’s undisputed crown jewel in Bahrain – a 188,000 square-foot mega-facility known as “the Freedom Souq” that houses a PX or Navy Exchange (NEX). The NEX, in turn, offers “an ice cream shop, bicycle shop, cell phone shop, tailor shop, barber and beauty shops, self-serve laundry, dry-cleaning service, rug Souq, nutrition shop, video rental, and a 24/7 mini-mart,” while selling everything from cosmetics and cameras to beer and wine.
Work is also going on in nearby Oman where, in the 1930s, the British Royal Air Force utilized an airfield on Masirah Island for its ventures in the Middle East. Today, the U.S. Air Force and members of other service branches do much the same, operating out of the island’s Camp Justice. From 2001-2009, the Army and Air Force each spent about $13 million on construction projects in the sultanate. Contractor Cosmopolitan-EMTA JV is now set to begin work there, too, after recently signing a $5 million contract with the Pentagon for an “Expeditionary Tent Beddown” (presumably an area meant to accommodate a potential future influx of forces).
– Meanwhile, in the neighboring United Arab Emirates, the U.S. Army alone spent $46 million between 2001-2009 on construction projects.
– In 1991, the U.S. military helped to push Saddam Hussein’s army out of Kuwait. After that, however, the country’s leader, Sheikh Jaber al-Ahmed al-Sabah, refused to return home “until crystal chandeliers and gold-plated bathroom fixtures could be reinstalled in Kuwait City’s Bayan Palace.” Today, about 30 miles south of the plush palace sits another pricey complex. Camp Arifjan grew exponentially as the Iraq War ramped up, gaining notoriety along the way as the epicenter of a massive graft and corruption scandal. Today, the base houses about 15,000 U.S. troops and features such fast-food favorites as Pizza Hut, Hardees, Subway, and Burger King.
– Another facility in Kuwait that has become a major stopover point on the road to and from Baghdad is Camp Buehring. Located north of Kuwait City, near the town of Udairi, the installation is chock-a-block full of amenities, including three PXs; telephone centers; two Internet cafés; Morale, Welfare, and Recreation centers; a movie theater; chapel; gym; volleyball court; basketball court; concert stage; gift shop; barber shop; jewelry store; and a number of popular eateries, including Burger King, Subway, Baskin Robbins, and Starbucks.
Writing about the base recently, Captain Charles Barrett of the 3rd Infantry Division’s 3rd Heavy Brigade Combat Team remarked, “There’s a USO with computers and a café. You know the café is good because it has that little mark over the letter ‘e.’ Soldiers are gaming on Xbox, PlayStation, and Wii. There are phone banks and board games and a place where parents can read to their kids and have the DVD mailed home.”
– The price tag for living the big-box-base lifestyle in Kuwait has, however, been steep. From 2003 to 2009, the U.S. Army spent in excess of $502 million on contracts for construction projects in the small, oil-rich nation, while the Air Force added almost $55 million and the Navy another $7 million. Total military spending there has been more massive still.
– Over the same span, according to U.S. government data, the Pentagon has spent nearly $20 billion in Kuwait, buying huge quantities of Kuwaiti oil and purchasing logistical support from various contractors for its facilities there (and elsewhere), among other expenditures.
o In 2006, for example, the international construction firm Archirodon was awarded $10 million to upgrade airfield lighting at al-Salem and al-Jaber, two Kuwaiti air bases used by American forces. Recently, there has also been a major scaling up of work at Camp Arifjan. In September, for example, the Pentagon awarded CH2M Hill Contractors a nearly $26 million deal to build a new communications facility on the base. Just days later, defense contractor ITT received an almost $87 million contract for maintenance and support services there.
– According to a recent Congressional Research Service report, “From 1950 through 2006, Saudi Arabia purchased and received from the United States weapons, military equipment, and related services through foreign military sales (FMS) worth over $62.7 billion and foreign military construction services (FMCS) worth over $17.1 billion.” Between 1946 and 2007, the Saudis also benefited from almost $295 million in foreign assistance funding from the U.S. military.
– From the lead-up to the First Gulf War in 1990 through the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the U.S. military stationed thousands of troops in Saudi Arabia. The American presence in the kingdom – the location of some of the holiest sites in Islam – was a major factor in touching off al-Qaeda’s current war with the United States. In 2003, in response to fundamentalist pressure on the Saudi government, the U.S. military announced it was pulling all but a small number of trainers out of the country.
– Yet while many U.S. troops have left, Pentagon contracts haven’t – a significant portion of them for construction projects for the Saudi Arabian military, which the U.S. trains and advises from sites like Eskan Village, a compound 20 kilometers south of Riyadh, where 800 U.S. personnel (500 of them advisers) are based.
– Between 2003-2009, the U.S. Army awarded $559 million in contracts for Saudi construction projects. In 2009, for example, it gave a $160 million deal to construction firm Saudi Oger Limited for the construction of facilities for a Saudi mechanized brigade based at al-Hasa, a $127 million contract to Saudi Lebanese Modern Construction Co. to erect structures for the Prince Turki Bin Abdul Aziz Battalion, and an $82 million agreement to top Saudi construction firm al-Latifia Trading and Contracting Company to build ammunition storage bunkers, possibly at the Saudi Arabian National Guard’s Khashm al-An Training Area.
– Additionally, military weaponry has continued to flow into Saudi Arabia by way of the Pentagon and so, too, have contracts to provide support services for that materiel. For example, earlier this year, under a U.S. Air Force contract extension, Cubic Corporation was awarded a $9.5 million deal “to continue to operate and maintain the air combat training system used to support F-15 fighter pilot training for the Royal Saudi Air Force.”
– Like the Saudis, Jordan’s leader, King Abdullah II, has long had a complex relationship with the U.S. shaped by domestic concerns over U.S. military action in the region and support for Israel. As with Saudi Arabia, none of that has stopped the U.S. military from forging ever closer ties with the kingdom.
– Recently, after testing and evaluating various training systems at multiple U.S. Army bases, the Jordanian Armed Forces selected Cubic’s combat training center system and under the auspices of the U.S. Army, the company was “awarded an $18 million contract to supply mobile combat training center instrumentation and training services to the Kingdom of Jordan.”
– The Pentagon has also invested in Jordanian military infrastructure. Between 2001-2009, the Army awarded $86 million in contracts for Jordanian construction projects. One major beneficiary was again Archirodon which, between 2006-2008, worked on the construction of the King Abdullah II Special Operations Training Center (KASOTC) – a state-of-the-art military and counter-terrorism training facility owned and operated by the Jordanian government but built, in part, under a $70 million U.S. Army contract. In 2009, Archirodon was awarded two additional contracts for $729,000 and $400,000, by the Air Force, for unspecified work in Jordan.
– When that 1,235-acre $200 million Jordanian training center was unveiled earlier this year, King Abdullah II himself gave the inaugural address, speaking “of his vision for KASOTC as a world-class special forces training center.” Not surprisingly, Gen. Petraeus was also on hand to give a speech in which he lauded Jordan as “a key partner … [which] has placed itself at the forefront of police and military training for regional security forces.”
Even as it lurches toward a quasi-withdrawal from Iraq, the U.S. military has been hunkering down and hardening its presence elsewhere in the Middle East with little fanfare or press coverage. There has been almost no discussion in this country of a host of possible repercussions that might come from this, ranging from local opposition to the U.S. military’s presence to the arming of undemocratic and repressive regimes in the region.
– With the sole exception of Iran, the U.S. military has fully garrisoned the nations of the Persian Gulf with air bases, naval bases, desert posts, training centers, and a whole host of other facilities, while also building up the military capacity of nearby Jordan.
The CIA efforts to topple Iran’s government in the 1950s, Washington’s support for Saddam Hussein’s Iraq in the 1980s, the Pentagon’s troop presence in Saudi Arabia in the 1990s – all were considered canny geopolitical moves in their time; all had unforeseen and devastating consequences.
– The money the Pentagon has recently been pouring into the nations of the Persian Gulf to bulk up base infrastructure has only tied the U.S. ever more tightly to the region’s autocratic, often unpopular regimes, while further arming and militarizing an area traditionally considered unstable. The Pentagon’s Persian Gulf base buildup has already cost Americans billions in tax dollars. What the costs in “blowback” will be remains the unknown part of the equation.
– Nick Turse is the associate editor of TomDispatch.com and the winner of a 2009 Ridenhour Prize for Reportorial Distinction as well as a James Aronson Award for Social Justice Journalism. His work has appeared in the Los Angeles Times, the Nation, In These Times, and regularly at TomDispatch. Turse is currently a fellow at New York University’s Center for the United States and the Cold War. A paperback edition of his book The Complex: How the Military Invades Our Everyday Lives (Metropolitan Books) was published earlier this year. His Web site is NickTurse.com.
Article printed from Antiwar.com Original: http://original.antiwar.com
URL to article: http://original.antiwar.com/engelhardt/2009/11/22/out-of-iraq-into-the-gulf/
Copyright © 2009 Antiwar.com Original. All rights reserved.