L’Europa appoggia la strategia per l’Afghanistan che mira alla “regionalizzazione”
● Nonostante crescenti tensioni economiche e politiche con gli USA, le potenze europee continueranno ad appoggiare la guerra in Afghanistan, e risponderanno positivamente alla richiesta di 10 000 nuovi soldati avanzata da Obama;
● avendo sostenuto il conflitto fin dal principio, subirebbero assieme agli USA le conseguenze di una disfatta stile Vietnam.
● Mentre le potenze chiedono a Karzai di combattere la corruzione, hanno esse stesse adottate una strategia che punta alla cooperazione con gli elementi più corrotti dell’Afghanistan,
● talebani compresi, che finora la propaganda imperialista ha usato per giustificare la guerra;
o il principale mediatore per i contatti già avviati con i “talebani moderati” sarebbe (secondo Der Spiegel) la famiglia reale saudita.
● L’incremento delle truppe espanderà gli scontri e causerà un maggior numero di vittime tra i civili; il rafforzamento dei capi tribali e dei signori della guerra aumenterà la paralisi del paese e lo sprofonderà in una guerra civile ancora più tribale:
● secondo l’antica formula “divide et impera”.
● Sempre più evidente la posta in gioco della guerra: il controllo imperialista di un paese da decenni molto importante per la sua collocazione tra Iran e subcontinente indiano e le due regioni petrolifere più importanti del mondo, il golfo e l’Asia Centrale.
o Solo pretesti le cause addotte: democratizzazione, cacciata dei talebani e distruzione di al-Qaeda, che in Afghanistan conterebbe oggi attualmente solo alcune decine di sostenitori.
o Il nuovo Ministro Esteri tedesco, zu Guttemberg, filo-americano: USA ed alleati sono costretti a vincere. Il nuovo dispiegamento di forze è «una prova del nove, non solo per la NATO, ma per l’intero Occidente».
o Guttenberg agli USA: il governo tedesco è pronto ad un maggior impegno al confine afghano-pakistano ed ad assumersi maggiori responsabilità, anche se le decisioni ufficiali sono rinviate a dopo la conferenza sull’Afghanistan prevista per gennaio.
● La decisione uscita dall’aspro confronto sulla conduzione della guerra in Afghanistan all’interno della classe dirigente americana e nella Nato
o comporta un forte aumento del numero di soldati (+30 000 americani e 10 000 dagli alleati)
o e una nuova strategia che porterebbe ad una “regionalizzazione” dell’Afghanistan, una suddivisione del paese come accaduto per il Libano e la ex Iugoslavia;
o Piano condiviso da Germania e USA, secondo le parole di Guttenberg in visita a Washington: «mettere da parte l’idea romantica di democratizzazione dell’intero paese secondo il modello occidentale» e invece «trasferire gradualmente il controllo delle singole province alle forze di sicurezza afghane».
o Le forze di occupazione stanno per trasferire il potere direttamente ai signori della guerra regionali e alle loro milizie, calcolando che questi obbediranno agli ordini delle potenze imperialiste.
o La Frankfurter Neue Presse sulla nuova strategia: i capi tribali e dei clan in cui è divisa la società afghana decidono il candidati presidenziali da proporre; vince le elezioni chi ha l’appoggio di un numero sufficiente di questi capi.
o Il generale britannico, Paul Newton, riassumendo la nuova strategia bellica: si dovranno riempire “interi bauli d’oro” per comperare la cooperazione dei comandanti regionali.
o Lo stesso presidente fantoccio, Karzai, è riuscito a rimanere al potere comperando i favori dei più importanti capi tribali regionali.
Guttenberg, definito dal presidente dell’americano CSIS (Center for Strategic and International Studies) l’uomo politico della Germania e forse dell’Europa più spesso ospitato a Washington, ha da tempo stretti contatti con politici americani influenti come il ministro Difesa, Robert Gates e il vice-segretario di Stato, Jim Steinberg.
Published by the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI)
– The US and its allies are planning a massive escalation of the war in Afghanistan. In a television address next Tuesday, delivered from the West Point military academy, US president Barack Obama will announce his plans to increase the current American military contingent of 68,000 by an estimated additional 30,000 soldiers.
– The NATO secretary-general Anders Fogh Rasmussen is at the same time seeking to drum up an additional 10,000 soldiers from European countries. There is every indication that he will get what he wants.
– Despite increasing economic and political tensions with the US, the European powers are completely behind the war in Afghanistan. Having supported the war from the start, European powers would suffer the consequences alongside the US of any Vietnam-style debacle.
– According to the new German defense secretary, Karl Theodor zu Guttenberg, the United States and its allies are condemned “to success” in Afghanistan. The deployment is “a litmus test, not only for the transatlantic alliance, but for the entire west,” he has said.
– The decision by president Obama was preceded by fierce disputes within the American leadership and NATO. The result is not only a substantial increase in troops, but also a new strategy, the precise implications of which are being played down with the term “regionalization”.
– During his inaugural visit to Washington, Guttenberg said it was necessary to put aside “the romantic idea of democratization of the whole country along the lines of the western model” and instead “transfer control of individual provinces step by step to the Afghan security forces.”
– Such plans are obviously shared by the American government and have been arrived at in discussions with the US administration. Guttenberg, who only took office four weeks ago, was received in Washington with open arms. He has long maintained close transatlantic contacts to such influential politicians as Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Senator John McCain and Deputy Secretary of State Jim Steinberg.
– Gates greeted his younger colleague as a “respected voice” in security policy and a “great friend” of the US. The president of the foreign policy think tank Center for Strategic and International Studies, John Hamre, called Guttenberg “the politician in Germany and probably Europe, who was most frequently a guest in Washington”.
– Guttenberg conveyed the readiness of the German government to expand its commitment along the Afghan-Pakistan border and also assume an “increased burden”. Officially any decision will wait until the international conference on Afghanistan planned for January, but the German defense secretary left no doubt that his government would support the planned expansion of the war.
– The new strategy of “regionalization” is aimed at dividing Afghanistan into individual cantons—in a similar manner to what took place in Lebanon and the former Yugoslavia. Up to now the US-NATO occupation supported the government of Hamid Karzai and sold the process to the public as “democratization”. However, occupation forces are moving increasingly to hand over power directly to regional warlords and their militias—on the assumption that such regional forces will follow the orders of their imperial masters. As soon as there is no more danger in a specific province, Guttenberg declared, then the international troops should be withdrawn from that area.
– The Frankfurter Neue Presse commented on the new strategy in Afghanistan as follows: “Afghanistan is a tribal and clan society, in which clan leaders determine which presidential candidates should be selected by his subjects. Whoever has the support of sufficient clan leaders wins the election.” The newspaper then quotes the British general Paul Newton, who in an utterly cynical fashion summed up the new war strategy by declaring one should pack “bags of gold” in order to buy the co-operation of regional rulers.
– Hamid Karzai, the puppet of the occupying powers, had also only been able to hold on to power by purchasing the favors of the most important regional clan leaders. While the occupation powers are publicly calling upon Karzai to proceed against corruption and favoritism, they have now adopted a strategy aimed at co-operation with the most corrupt elements in Afghanistan.
– The Taliban, the vilification of which has so far played an important role in US-NATO propaganda justifying the war, is also included in such co-operation. According to newspaper reports, the US government has already established contact with “moderate Taliban” elements in Afghanistan. According to the German magazine Der Spiegel, the chief mediator for these contacts is the Saudi royal family.
– The new war strategy will have catastrophic consequences for the population of Afghanistan. The increase in troop levels will lead to an expansion of the conflict and a correspondingly higher level of civilian victims. The strengthening of the status of regional clan leaders and warlords will increasing paralyze the country and plunge it into even more tribal and civil conflict.
The incessant manipulation of regional conflicts reduces the country in the long term into a plaything for imperialist interests. In his own presumptuous manner, Guttenberg terms this a “self-sufficing security structure”. In fact it is the oldest tactic in the colonial war book: divide and rule.
The true character of the Afghanistan war is becoming ever more evident. The issue was never democratization, nor the driving out of the Taliban or the punishment of Al Qaeda, whose supporters in Afghanistan are currently estimated at only a few dozen.
– The issue at stake is imperialist control of a country that for decades has been of great geopolitical importance due to its location between Iran and the Indian subcontinent and the two most productive oil regions of the world, the Gulf and Central Asia.
– The war is not only directed against the Afghan people, it is taking place against the will and to a large extent behind the backs of the American and European population, the majority of whom reject the war.
About the WSWS | Contact Us | Privacy Statement | Top of page
Copyright © 1998-2009 World Socialist Web Site – All rights reserved